It is a fact that humanity has evolved
through many a civilization and quite a few among them were unique in their
history. It is on record, during Mayan, Greek, Roman, Byzantine, Babylonian,
and still more ancient civilizations of Chinese, Egyptian, and Indus valley, material progress was at its zenith. Though
the modern gadgetry was not invented in those times but progress in other
spheres of life viz., art, culture, music, architecture, medicines, hygiene,
agriculture, trade, industry and general standards of living, was not inferior
to today’s standards. Rather in several disciplines they surpassed the current
times: excepting physical sciences, these civilizations were far ahead in every
other respect. Each civilization nourished on its values and flourished in
their peculiar fields. But the most noticeable commonality amongst them was
their twofold development; material development as well as the ‘thought’
development. The driving force was intellect and wisdom. Intellect always
projects itself through material projections, whereas ‘thought’ finds its
expression through the medium of fine arts, literature, music, besides all that
makes the inorganic world so beautiful.
Another similarity which was conspicuous in each civilization was their final enactment of self-disintegration. Each one, when it was at its pinnacle, developed similar symptoms of its ruin. All organs of the state got steeped in luxury and corruption: Sunk in indolence and debauchery, each caved in under its own weight of degenerated values. The ‘thought’, which was once their lifeline, went haywire in each case and the hegemony of materialism reigned: And material progress, at its peek, inevitably leads to war, annihilation and destruction.
Then should it be surmised, that material progress always dominates the finer sensitivities? That the ultimate pinnacle of each civilization was, moral depravity!
Each age produced its own
Alexander, Nero, Changez Khan, Halaku Khan, Napoleon, Machiavelli and Hitler.
All of them left indelible marks on the pages of human history. But the most
lethal of them all was the class of nobility: Subedars, Lords, Sardar
Bahadhurs, Nawabs and today’s politicians. Due to the public apathy toward this
class of ‘elites’ which emerges after the fall of every history maker and
becomes the cause of final nemesis of the very ‘thought’ on which were built
the lofty empires of values. History provides us with a long list of such
ruffians, who openly loot and usurp public property and warns us repeatedly,
but the results have always been the same. We let ourselves be be-fooled and
bludgeoned by the likes of these jokers---the elite, who are, involved in
scores of scandals running into millions, but still they continue to show their
ugly faces from the equally tainted media. Another similarity which was conspicuous in each civilization was their final enactment of self-disintegration. Each one, when it was at its pinnacle, developed similar symptoms of its ruin. All organs of the state got steeped in luxury and corruption: Sunk in indolence and debauchery, each caved in under its own weight of degenerated values. The ‘thought’, which was once their lifeline, went haywire in each case and the hegemony of materialism reigned: And material progress, at its peek, inevitably leads to war, annihilation and destruction.
Then should it be surmised, that material progress always dominates the finer sensitivities? That the ultimate pinnacle of each civilization was, moral depravity!
Why the ‘civilize’ continue to allow this dehumanization---not only by being deprived of wealth and property but let their conscience be mortgaged by forced conversion---by the baser elements of the decaying societies? Does it indicate some ingrained deficiency in our genes that impel us towards violence, greed, lust and power, which are intrinsically the by-product of material progress?,,,,,,,,,cont
No comments:
Post a Comment